Good exposures shouldn't require a lot of manipulation. The point is can you do good work without a lot of expensive software. It appears that the answer is yes.
William Robb wrote: > Ok, here's 3 that went straight to the web from photographic media with > little or no manipulation, mostly because I didn't know what the heck I was > doing. > > This was shot on Kodachome film, scanned with an HP Photosmart S10 scanner, > sized and saved as a jpeg using Adobe PhotoDeluxe, which came with my Umax > scanner. > http://pug.komkon.org/01sep/Hosta.html > > This was shot on the 6x7, and probably scanned from the contact sheet on my > Umax scanner using the supplied PhotoDeluxe software > http://pug.komkon.org/02apr/maria.html > > This would have been shot on some sort of colour neg film and scanned on my > Umax using PhotoDeluxe. > http://pug.komkon.org/02jun/virginia.html > > > William Robb > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
