Or cheaper still, present your photos at a slightly smaller resolution. Then it doesn't cost anyone anything.
D. On 4/4/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DUH, then simply get a 20" high resolution LCD > for cheap. I never insisted that anyone had > to get a 19" and 20" would be a problem. You are arguing the absurd > here, > just to argue from what I can see. Its hard to get, 14",15",17" > monitors now too, display "average" sizes move forward, AS > DO "average" RESOLUTIONS, even while the prices continue to falll... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:52 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: > WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > There are essentially no desktop LCD's that exceed 1280x1024 in sizes > smaller than 20". 20" and up displays have come down in price a lot > recently, but they still command a fairly large premium over a 19" > 1280x1024 display, with little gain for most users. > > Also there's been plenty of LCD options over 1280x1024 resolution for > the last 5 years. They just weren't cheap. There's been a good selection > > of 20"+ LCD's that run higher resolutions as long as I've been following > > LCD display technology (which is since Apple introduced the 20" Cinema > Display around 5 years ago). The selection hasn't changed much (1-2 > panels at any one time from each major brand) but the pricing has. > > -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
