Fair enough. Care to answer one more question? I'm curious about your views on the nature of the added value. I agree that it makes sense to use ALL CAPS STUFF occasionally for emphasis. I'm more interested in why you think that the aggressive messages add any value at all to the PDML.
--Mark J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >yes I do. the CAPS are for emphisis, and I dont >use them all the time, only when needed. I dont >take the stance there is never any need for CAPS >and hence should never be used. >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf >Of >Mark Erickson >Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:37 PM >To: pdml >Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO > > >JC, > >You still haven't answered my original question: > >Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any >value at all to the PDML? > > --Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
