Bill, Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not "scientific." Greywolf is absolutely correct in his contention <LOL> Of course, over the years, in many areas, we've seen the scientific evidence means less than squat.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: William Robb > > The lab/camera shop at which I > > worked a couple of years ago tended to > > support the "babies as most popular > > subject matter" theory. The owner > > said their prime customer was a woman > > with a baby stroller. In fact, there was a > > children's clothing store just a few doors > > down and when it went out of business > > the lab saw a major decline in volume. > > > > I did something like 25 years in the lab industry. Greywolf will say this > won't count for anything, since he doesn't believe in knowledge gained by > experience over time, but my observation was babies and children as the big > volume subject, with pets as a not so close second. > Note this is on the amateur side of the business. > The pro side is weddings as the big volume subject by a huge margin. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
