Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show he is completely clueless. His deductions make no sense because he either doesnt understand or never noticed how unsharp mask works or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it.
jco ----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:20 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thibouille" Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh > Mmm I find the bokeh to be quite OK: not bad but not good either. But > this lens seems very sharp otherwise. > > Mmm I wonder if digital vs film has a big influence over bokeh. I'd > like to see a comparison like this. Something I discovered very early on, thanks to Valentin, was that the surest way to screw up bokeh is to apply sharpening to the image. The M85 has just about the smoothest bokeh of any lens I have seen: http://plg.komkon.org/m85_2/bo1.html. But, like anything else, heavy handed treatment can bugger things up. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
