So what is the word for compulsive baiting ?

Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh


> egomania           irrational self-centered attitude or self-worship
>
> enissomania        inability to prevent onself from attacking or 
> critcizing
>
> rhinotillexomania  compulsive nose picking
>
> Tom C.
>
>>From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
>>Subject: RE: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:25 -0400
>>
>>Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show
>>he is completely clueless. His deductions make
>>no sense because he either doesnt understand
>>or never noticed how unsharp mask works
>>or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly
>>stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible
>>in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain
>>bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that
>>based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it.
>>
>>jco
>>----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>William Robb
>>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:20 PM
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Thibouille"
>>Subject: Re: More 85mm f2.0 smc-M bokeh
>>
>>
>> > Mmm I find the bokeh to be quite OK: not bad but not good either. But
>> > this lens seems very sharp otherwise.
>> >
>> > Mmm I wonder if digital vs film has a big influence over bokeh. I'd
>> > like to see a comparison like this.
>>
>>Something I discovered very early on, thanks to Valentin, was that the
>>surest way to screw up bokeh is to apply sharpening to the image. The
>>M85
>>has just about the smoothest bokeh of any lens I have seen:
>>http://plg.komkon.org/m85_2/bo1.html.
>>But, like anything else, heavy handed treatment can bugger things up.
>>
>>William Robb


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to