Looks like I'm going to need tighter filtering, but, as long as I saw this
...

JCO, the thread has moved from your specific comment through the general
rendering of the 85mm lens bokeh to some general comments about bokeh. 
It's no longer about YOUR specific comments.  Threads and discussions on
the PDML, as well as other mail lists, tend to wander.

Further, you are now making a personal attack by calling a contributor to
the thread "clueless."  True, it's only a mild attack, but one that's going
to leave you open to some negative comments and possibly start another
flame war, more than likely causing you to, once again, use abusive
language and post your messages using lots of upper case  letters, and get
any number of people here to the point where they'll start responding in
kind, as which already seems to be the case.

I just don't understand you.  A couple of days ago Norm and I apologized
for contributing to the last outburst, and Tim strongly took your side of
that issue, and your response was "fuck you" in three separate posts, one
to Norm, one directed at me, and least understandable, one to Tim.

Relax, chill out, enjoy your camera, or your DVD player, or your HDTV ...
vent your anger in other ways - go out and take a walk, get some exercise,
cut back on the sugar intake.   LIGHTEN UP - not every comment is about you
or directed to you.

Kind regards,

Shel



>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Secondly, this WR guy's posts, really show
> > he is completely clueless. His deductions make
> > no sense because he either doesnt understand
> > or never noticed how unsharp mask works
> > or he doesnt read the posts in entirety because I clearly
> > stated that this bokeh problem is easily visible
> > in the viewfinder. Either or both ways its just plain
> > bad to be posting completely wrong stuff like that
> > based on lack of knowledge in the manner in which he posts it. 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to