Some of those shots of Paris are really beautiful, Ann.

--
 Bob
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of ann sanfedele
> Sent: 23 April 2007 22:50
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Just for the hell of it!
> 
> Toine wrote:
> 
> >Digital isn't better than film.It's a lot easier and in theory
> >cheaper. In fact thanks to digital I started shooting again. The
dark
> >room was a disaster and shooting color pos. or neg. was  
> even worse. I
> >hated the long waiting and the ugly prints from the color lab.
Tried
> >PhotoCd and digital scanners which was a little more fun but very
> >expensive and time consuming.
> >Shooting RAW and inkjet printers is what I want!
> >So every picture I have shot the last years would not have 
> made with film.
> >
> 
> Lots of shots I've taken I couldn't have gotten using digital - I 
> couldn't have reacted soon enough...
> I also couldn't have gotten them with camera's that required 
> batteries 
> for anything but a light meter...
> I couldn't react fast enough... a KX or an LX (without the 
> winder) and a 
> 50mm lens , tri-x  - shutter speed at
> 250, f8 and hyperfocal distance set -  and the camera around my neck

> requiring only that I lift the camera to
> my eye and click...  
> 
> This one is one that no matter how quick my reflexes were, the 
> combination of having to turn on the camera
> and turn off the auto focus , etc... would have done me in, I think
- 
> because I was shooting through the
> dirty window of a train  - if I had to change the auto focus 
> I normally 
> use shooting digital to manual and turn
> on the camera I'd have been dead - well, or gotten a different
shot...
> 
> also,  there was much less to know about a manual camera - aperture,

> shutter speed, focus, ISO, DOF view, quickly changed
> with visible knobs.  
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/2vqkx5
> 
> The main benefits of digital to me are
> 
> no dark room chemicals to inhale or dispose of.
> being able to "chimp" (when one is taking pics of something 
> one can do a 
> quick do over on)
> and quickly get my ebay stuff photo'ed and on line.
> 
> the lightness of the camera - my LX feels like I'm carrying workout 
> weights when I lift it now.
> and the speed with which I can see results
> 
> ann
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >On 4/23/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is 
> that digital is
> >>better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo 
> that they took
> >>with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, 
> have done with
> >>film.
> >>
> >>-graywolf
> >>
> >>--
> >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to