Thanks, Jack. I think I am stupidly bothered by  the bush on the left 
detracting from all the horizontal lines. But I have  decided it is way too 
much 
trouble to remove. Only so much "creative gardening"  I can do.

It probably is better than the first shot I showed. It is  considerably 
wetter, anyway. ;-)(  
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wetlands1.htm).

Are they  sandpipers? I was wondering.

Marnie aka Doe :-)

===========
I  think I like this somewhat better. The additional "mothball fleet" is
well  placed. While not major elements, the two Killdeer or Sandpipers,
or (?) in  the foreground are nice elements and the scene certainly
looks  "wetter".

Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Sorry, I was  going to hold off on more PESOs  until next week.
> Because I've  
> felt that taken up a lot of bandwidth this week.  But...
>  
> The teacher liked most of my shots. Except he felt some had flat  
> light and 
> should be reshot. I am not so thrilled about that,  as I don't like to
>  slow 
> down and revisit when I am on a  roll. However, one I might.
> 
> The  wetlands one he wanted  more wetlands, although liking the 
> composition.
> 
> Bruce  wanted more mothballed fleet. 
> 
> This was shot  the same  time as the other one. It may actually be
> better than 
> Wet Lands  #1,  although I liked #1's simplicity. Note that you can
> see the  
> same ducks on an  island in the middle.
> 
> So I am  now curious, Bruce, do you like this one  better?  
> 
>  http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wetlands2.htm
> 
>  Comments  welcome.
> 
> Marnie aka Doe   :-)


---------------------------------------------
Warning: I am  now filtering my email, so you may be censored.  




************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to