Thanks, Jack. I think I am stupidly bothered by the bush on the left detracting from all the horizontal lines. But I have decided it is way too much trouble to remove. Only so much "creative gardening" I can do.
It probably is better than the first shot I showed. It is considerably wetter, anyway. ;-)( http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wetlands1.htm). Are they sandpipers? I was wondering. Marnie aka Doe :-) =========== I think I like this somewhat better. The additional "mothball fleet" is well placed. While not major elements, the two Killdeer or Sandpipers, or (?) in the foreground are nice elements and the scene certainly looks "wetter". Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, I was going to hold off on more PESOs until next week. > Because I've > felt that taken up a lot of bandwidth this week. But... > > The teacher liked most of my shots. Except he felt some had flat > light and > should be reshot. I am not so thrilled about that, as I don't like to > slow > down and revisit when I am on a roll. However, one I might. > > The wetlands one he wanted more wetlands, although liking the > composition. > > Bruce wanted more mothballed fleet. > > This was shot the same time as the other one. It may actually be > better than > Wet Lands #1, although I liked #1's simplicity. Note that you can > see the > same ducks on an island in the middle. > > So I am now curious, Bruce, do you like this one better? > > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wetlands2.htm > > Comments welcome. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

