--- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:18:02PM -0400, Christian > wrote: > > Brendan MacRae wrote: > > > --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> For most people, the (significant) extra cost > of the > > >> larger > > >> sensor just isn't worth it. > > > > > > For most people, yes. For most serious > > > photographers...that may be another story. > > > > PJs, sports guys and, yes, nature pros use 1DmkIIs > with a 1.3x "crop" > > They seem pretty serious.... > > Not to mention all those guys out there with Nikons > ... > > I guess we poor Pentax users can't be "serious" > photographers, either. > > And all the time I thought it was the photographer, > not the gear ... >
You know, these kinds of comments are BS. Where do you get off? Point me to where I ever made this suggestion. You said most people wouldn't opt to spend the significant extra dough for a FF camera. You didn't specify who these "most people" are. I assumed you meant photographers of one kind or another. I only suggested that the more serious the photographer the more likely that person would opt for better gear. That's all. In fact, I wasn't even being unequivocal about it. I said, "For most serious photographers...that may be another story." In other words, may or MAY NOT. But somehow, according to you what I said was this: Pentax doesn't offer a FF camera, Only FF cameras are used by pros, Ergo, Pentaxians are not pros. Also, photographs don't matter, gear does. Yeah, well, if that's what I said, or even implied...well, you got me! Whatever... -Brendan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
