On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:08:30PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wrote: > > --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:18:02PM -0400, Christian > > wrote: > > > Brendan MacRae wrote: > > > > --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> For most people, the (significant) extra cost > > of the > > > >> larger > > > >> sensor just isn't worth it. > > > > > > > > For most people, yes. For most serious > > > > photographers...that may be another story. > > > > > > PJs, sports guys and, yes, nature pros use 1DmkIIs > > with a 1.3x "crop" > > > They seem pretty serious.... > > > > Not to mention all those guys out there with Nikons > > ... > > > > I guess we poor Pentax users can't be "serious" > > photographers, either. > > > > And all the time I thought it was the photographer, > > not the gear ... > > > > You know, these kinds of comments are BS. > > Where do you get off? Point me to where I ever made > this suggestion. You said most people wouldn't opt to > spend the significant extra dough for a FF camera. You > didn't specify who these "most people" are. I assumed > you meant photographers of one kind or another. I only > suggested that the more serious the photographer the > more likely that person would opt for better gear.
Precisely. You just plain assume that "better" means "larger sensor". That's the viewpoint that's full of BS. You (although not only you) seem to think that a K1D (if one ever shows up) is somehow an inferior product if it doesn't have a 36x24 sensor. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
