In a message dated 5/9/2007 10:55:12 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is nothing underhanded or illegal about what they are proposing. If they own the building and wish to liquidate it that's their business, it's irrelevant to the Hoya merger deal.
-- Rob Studdert ========== And sorry if you think I am stupid or something, but I don't remember reading on list the suggestion that they have a buyer already lined up. Because it is only a clever move is a buyer IS already lined up. Otherwise it's a pretty dumb move, unless they are doing it to reduce debit and also plan to lay off people. But if they are selling the building just to raise money, with a buyer in hand already then no one has to move out of the building. And after the Hoya deadline is over, Pentax can buy back the building. With stock concessions to whoever bought it. Marnie Well, this sort of thing makes my brain hurt, anyway. :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
