Hi Tim,
My view of all three shots are that they're somewhat interesting because of
the weather. I did not find any of them to be good images, in either the
photographic or art sense.
If you really like these birds as a subject, I would suggest studying the
images, taking into account the critical feedback received, and returning to
work the subject again at a future time.
With wildlife and bird shots, having the subjects in sharp, crisp focus is a
prerequisite, and none of these were.
A parallel thread that's been going on is the need to critically examine and
edit one's images. I sense that while seeing these birds first hand in those
condtions was exciting, that the images lack what you really were hoping to
capture.
I don't think it works standalone and I would not use it as part of a
series.
Sincerely and friendly-like,
Tom C.
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Heavy Weather 3
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:34:10 -0400
It would have more impact on me if the foreground birds weren't merging
into
the black rocks.
Thumbsdown.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Heavy Weather 3
> One more. Less subtile this time. From a technical point of view this is
> better, but IMO this has less impact.
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=309366
>
> Whatdoyoathink? As stand alone, and as part of the series?
>
> Tim Typo
> Mostly Harmless
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
