Unless they like it just the way it is. It's happened to me.
Tom C. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Pentax Full-Year Profit Exceeds Company's Forecast >Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:34:12 +0000 > >In the real world no one with even a bit of common sense would convert a >RAW at default settings. The whole idea of shooting RAW is to optimize the >image. >Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- >From: Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 11.05.2007, at 15:37 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > > > So ... are you proposing that because you perceive Olympus' > > > profitability to be stronger than Pentax', we should abandon and dump > > > our Pentax gear and buy Olympus gear? Not that it would bother me ... > > > the latest generation of Olympus/Panasonic/Leica DSLR bodies are > > > quite good performers and the Olympus Zuiko and Leica lenses being > > > produced for the 4/3 System lens mount are excellent. You can also > > > use Nikon, Canon, Pentax and other lenses on them with available > > > adapters. > > Well, according to one of the first E-410 tests new sensor + new in- > > camera image processing lowered noise and greatly increased sharpness > > of JPEG files straight from the camera. Actually JPEG form this Oly > > at "0" sharpness setting produces sharper images than RAW from K10D > > converted in Aperture at default settings (I know it because I wrote > > K10D test for this page taking similar test shots). Here is the test > > with sample photos: > > http://www.fotopolis.pl/index.php?n=5829&p=3 > > > > > > Cheers, > > Sylwek > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
