They don't look at Pentax as a camera company, they look at what the parts are worth as parts.
William Robb wrote: > On 5/11/07, Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> ''I find no reason to be under the wing of >> >>> a huge capital.'' >>> >> Read: We won't lie down and be swallowed up and busted >> apart by another company who doesn't share our values. >> >> Good for Pentax, I applaud them. >> >> -Brendan >> >> >> >> >> >> > > One of the things I've not been able to figure out from this whole > thing is why a company like Sparx would buy into a camera company and > then bitch when the company resists their efforts to get them out of > their core business. > I figure it's the investors who are clueless, not Pentax in this one. > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
