"Juan J. Buhler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [Thoughts on Mike J.'s comments on possible future digital SLRs]
>> 
>> Illuminating as ever, Mike, and the point that there is no law of
>> nature that favours a 36x24mm frame is a fair one.  However, if
>> Pentax is to move to a smaller-frame digital SLR, while still
>> maintaining compatibility with the lenses we all value so highly,
>> there's some work to do in the area of wideangles.
>
>Well, this would break compatibility with film cameras, but how about
>making lenses that are optimized for the smaller CCDs? They wouldn't
>have to have as big a coverage, and you'd get heavy vignetting if you
>used them on a K-mount film camera, but they'd probably be compact and
>high quality...

...and those who shoot film and digital would have to have two sets of lenses
instead of one. And *carry* both sets whenever we're out shooting both film and
digital.

-- 
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to