On 5/23/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/23/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Frank - I like the composition. Undecided about the sharpness of the > > foreground guy. > > > > >I can't brighten, sharpen or anything else to enhance this thing. It's > > > completely unmanipulated, straight from the camera. > > > > Frank, I don't know if you're seeing consistent trends in the camera output, > > but there are in-camera defaults that might help you achieve better out of > > the camera images. > > I understand that, however, with the thought that I'll soon have a > computer with the latest PS installed into which I can transfer my > images for post-processing, I'm thinking I don't want the camera to do > too much sharpening or anything like that. I'm thinking (perhaps > wrongly?) that it's easier to sharpen an unprocessed image than it > would be to unsharpen something that's been fiddled around with. > > Of course, I could be wrong...
I think Ken is referring to custom function 300 D, were you Tell the camer your in a subway, but you're actually outside.:-) Dave > > Thanks for the commeant! > > cheers, > frank > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
