>I'm thinking I don't want the camera to do too much sharpening or anything >like that. I'm thinking (perhaps wrongly?) that it's easier to sharpen an >unprocessed image than it would be to unsharpen >something that's been >fiddled around with.
Definitely you get better image manipulation capability outside of the camera with programs like PS etc. I keep all my image correction in-camera defaults in a null position for that reason. I only suggested this because I have several acquaintances that are trying to get satisfactory images direct from the camera without further manipulations. Wasn't aware you'd be getting PS capability - Great! Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Convergence > On 5/23/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Frank - I like the composition. Undecided about the sharpness of the >> foreground guy. >> >> >I can't brighten, sharpen or anything else to enhance this thing. It's >> > completely unmanipulated, straight from the camera. >> >> Frank, I don't know if you're seeing consistent trends in the camera >> output, >> but there are in-camera defaults that might help you achieve better out >> of >> the camera images. > > I understand that, however, with the thought that I'll soon have a > computer with the latest PS installed into which I can transfer my > images for post-processing, I'm thinking I don't want the camera to do > too much sharpening or anything like that. I'm thinking (perhaps > wrongly?) that it's easier to sharpen an unprocessed image than it > would be to unsharpen something that's been fiddled around with. > > Of course, I could be wrong... > > Thanks for the comment! > > cheers, > frank -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
