Hi! I usually have a short zoom (28-70mm range) and a telephoto prime with a big aperture to shoot with available light (usually my 135/2.5). The short zoom is for group and close quarter shots; the telephoto are for the ceremony since I usually avoid going on the altar or stage area of the church.
My wedding photos are on http://www.bong.uni.cc/gallery click on 'weddings' Bong On 6/29/07, Gasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, > > my usual lens are MF 50/1.4 and 135/3.5 ... not very good for reportages > and weddings :) > > Another option will be F28/2.8, no zoom but at least fast prime. And > AutoFocus. > > G > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Yes, the DA 16-45 is very good. I shot a wedding recently and used > > just the DA 16-45 and the DA 50-200 for all but the studio shots. > > They served me well. At the reception I used only the DA 16-45. For > > the ceremony, I needed the DA 50-200 for some shots. I had both > > lenses mounted on two camera. No problem. > > Paul > > On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Gasha wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> i just realised, that i need zoom and AF lens for wedding photography. > >> > >> So far i heard good words about DA 16-45. Is it ok? > >> > >> > >> Gasha > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
