Thanks, my usual lens are MF 50/1.4 and 135/3.5 ... not very good for reportages and weddings :)
Another option will be F28/2.8, no zoom but at least fast prime. And AutoFocus. G Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, the DA 16-45 is very good. I shot a wedding recently and used > just the DA 16-45 and the DA 50-200 for all but the studio shots. > They served me well. At the reception I used only the DA 16-45. For > the ceremony, I needed the DA 50-200 for some shots. I had both > lenses mounted on two camera. No problem. > Paul > On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Gasha wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> >> i just realised, that i need zoom and AF lens for wedding photography. >> >> So far i heard good words about DA 16-45. Is it ok? >> >> >> Gasha >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
