Reads to me like that's exactly the intent. They clearly state that the final decision on those images ultimately offered to their judges, will be that of Pentax.
Jack --- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > >Yes, enough is enough. And if the photo.net model of peer evaluation > > >is any indication of how well this might work. Well, it won't. Not a > > >good idea in my estimation. > > >From the way I read it, they seem to be asking for input from > gallery > contributors, but not choosing photos by that means exclusively. In > other words, their judges will still have some (I'd guess, final) > say. > > No telling for certain but if this is the case but I'd say it's a > good > idea: Get gallery members to separate the wheat from the chaff and > then > have the official judges make the final cut. > > They certainly need to do *something* to reduce their turnaround > time. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
