The Ds is reputed to be a much faster handling machine. I get ~6 raw images shooting the D and ~5 shooting the Ds before the buffer fills. The Ds clears the buffer much faster. It does make a difference. In most circumstances I grab the Ds mostly for other reasons. That said the way I shoot I'd rather have a 6 shot buffer and a slower bus than a three shot buffer, (like the K100/110), and a much faster bus. Right now the K10D is on the horizon, but still just a bit out of reach.
David Savage wrote: > Six of one, half a dozen of another. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 8/5/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's not the tiny little buffer that's the problem, it's the time it >> takes to clear it. >> >> David Savage wrote: >> >>> On 8/5/07, syb vis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> What's your reason to get a K10D? >>>> >>>> >>> Bigger buffer. >>> >>> Toward the end of it's primary role, the *istD's tiny little buffer >>> had me constantly muttering & cursing at it. >>> > > -- The difference between Microsoft and 'Jurassic Park': In one, a mad businessman makes a lot of money with beasts that should be extinct. The other is a film. -- Unattributed -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
