Hi Wendy, Given that you own a 50-500 what is the effective maximum apterture at 400mm ?
I intend to shoot sports (usually in good light we are blessed with that here). and nature photography. The down side of the 100-300 is that to gain the 420mm focal length you have to fiddle with adding the T/C which may not be practical in an "action" situation this means that I will end up using it with the TC most of the time. Regards Patrick On 8/21/07, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have both of those lenses, but I don't have the TC to compare the > quality difference if the 1.4x tc is used. > I'm selling my 50-500 (posted here approx 2 weeks ago) as I don't need > the reach. > Also I find it a little large and unwieldy as it lengthens when zoomed > out fully. > > Wendy > > On 8/19/07, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to be needing a long telezoom approx 400mm at the long end > > for nature photography ... the 50-500 seems to be very popular for > > this type of photography. How does it compare with 100-300 + 1.4x TC > > combo ? > > > > Regards > > > > Patrick Genovese > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Regards Patrick Genovese -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
