Ah, so only you know if something is art? And if it is not art to you it is crap?
On the other hand I will give you an example of something I think was good art. In a waiting room was this rather banal looking painting of a small fishing town on a stormy day. As I sat there waiting my appointment I became more and more depressed. After a bit I realized it was the painting; the artist had caught the weather and rather run down state of the fishing village so well the sense of depression that you did not even notice in the first look transferred itself to you own mind. That is good art, where the artist can transfer his emotional state about the image to the viewer. I would not for the life of me have that painting in my living room however. I always sat with my back to the painting after that. frank theriault wrote: > > And, for what it's worth, I think art is so subjective, it's not the > intent of the artist, but the "feeling" of the viewer that "makes" art > what it is (and if it is). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
