That article is just plain abusive, referring to the mockup as a "dummy version".
Tom C. >From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority' >Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:18:28 +1000 > >On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... > >Wasting bandwidth or your time am I? > >-- >Rob Studdert >HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO >http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
