I'd go with the MX as well. I loved my PZ-1p for all it was feature wise, and IMO it had really good metering.
I never owned an LX, but I was frankly afraid to because of the repair/service frequency I saw anecdotally on the list. I'm sure the MZ-S was a nice camera, but it was in many respects too little, too late. Tom C. >From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Film slrs >Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:50:40 -0400 > >The last great 35mm SLR? The MX. The only things I can see that would have >improved the MX are better quality seals and a bit of ruggedization. The >only near great after that were the LX and the MZ-S. The did make a lot of >consumer crap although most of them were OK for what they were. > >Of course, you have to understand that I do not like robocameras when >reading the above. > > >Jim Apilado wrote: > > What was the last great 35mm slr that Pentax made? The *ist, or the > > MZ-S? > > > > Jim A. > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
