LOL The LX had more features and was arguably prettier to look at, but I could use a Nikon F2 as a hammer and re-shingle a roof with it, and it would still be in perfect alignment and take exceptional photographs for another lifetime. Some of us valued that far more than whether it was considered a mechanical jewel. It was a tank and a shockingly well made camera of exceptional capability. And the Nikon F3, my favorite, was no slouch either... ;-)
G On Aug 27, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Bob Blakely wrote: > The LX. > No other contender, and not by ANY brand. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
