You answered your own question. "It's good to know your thoughts on this, Bob"
Ergo, I did a good thing. HAR! FYI, it wasn't necessary "to broadcast them", but keep in mind that very, very little that is "broadcast" on this list is necessary. Furthermore, I did not "feel" anything about my post. I simply desired to share my thoughts regarding my choices Re: the whole "D" system of lenses. Most of what goes on here is an exchange of thoughts, beliefs & musings concerning photography, photographic gear (primarily Pentax gear), displays of what we've done & comments on what others have displayed. Those were mine regarding lenses that support less than full frame . I will, however, keep in mind that you require reasons for my posts, lest you are forced to live in discomforting mystery. Franky, Godfrey, I don't need to know why you share anything that you do. It's good enough for me that you desired to do it. And, Godfrey, I have no idea why I chose the tag line that I did save for that it amused me, so if you can't solve that mystery either, don't worry, there's no answer. Regards, Bob... -------------------------------------------------------- "Life isn't like a box of chocolates . . it's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your butt tomorrow." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's good to know your thoughts on this, Bob, but why you felt it > necessary to broadcast them are a complete mystery to me. > > On Aug 27, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Bob Blakely wrote: > >> I won't own a lens that may have an image circle that won't cover >> 24x36mm >> properly. Period. All the lenses I purchased for use on my K10D >> were the >> "Limited's". 31mm, 43mm, 77mm. They have to do their duty on my >> LXen too, ya >> know. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
