Thank you for the clarification, Adam...

Glen

On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

> I was recommending the A version of the 35/2, if only for
> future-proofing your lenses. The 40/2.8 is only available in M or DA
> Limited versions and the latter will only function in P and Tv  
> modes on
> your Super Program, rendering it less than useful(it remains the  
> sole DA
> lens to fully cover 35mm, making it quite usable on a PZ or *ist  
> film body).
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
>
> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>> Thanks, Adam.  With regard to the 40/2.8, I thought you were
>> recommending the A 40/2.8 lens?  KEH has these in the M-series.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>>> Glen,
>>>
>>> KEH has the 40/2.8 in BGN condition (good glass & aperture, some
>>> barrel wear) for $126, and a couple 35/2 SMC-M's in the same
>>> condition of around $200. Both are reasonably good deals.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>> Thanks, Adam.  I have a habit of reading things too quickly.  I am
>>>> glad, in this case, it did not prove costly.
>>>>
>>>> I still have not settled on a lens yet.  Overall, I would probably
>>>> prefer either of the two you have suggested--though I do not like
>>>> paying a premium for an item that is not truly rare.  That M-
>>>> Series f/
>>>> 1.7 on eBay disappeared shortly after I mentioned it here.  I am  
>>>> not
>>>> saying there is necessarily a connection between these two events,
>>>> but I guess I learned something of a lesson from this experience.
>>>>
>>>> Glen
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Don't worry, many sellers make that mistake as well. Leads to some
>>>>> interesting prices on A50/2's.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>
>>>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not know why, but I saw the "1:2" on the lens, but read it,
>>>>>> "1.2"--my mistake.  Thank you for letting me know about the live
>>>>>> auction issue.  I will keep this in mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:39 AM, David Savage wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope that's an A50mm f2.0. And is rather common. The f1.2
>>>>>>> version is
>>>>>>> quite rare & sort after because it's Pentax's fastest 50.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the auction I was referring too:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Pentax-A-50mm-f-1-2-Brand-
>>>>>>> new_W0QQitemZ150142428678QQihZ005QQcategoryZ30070QQtcZphotoQQcmd 
>>>>>>> ZV
>>>>>>> ie
>>>>>>> wI
>>>>>>> tem>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm posting this off list because people can get upset with you
>>>>>>> if you
>>>>>>> post links to live auctions that others may be watching :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/28/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for the tip...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just so that I know we are on the same page (pun intended), is
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> the item you have in mind:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/SMC-PENTAX-A-1-2-50mm-Lens-Pentax-K1000- 
>>>>>>>> Auto-
>>>>>>>> SLRs_W0QQitemZ280145469555QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item280145469555
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to