I held out for the 90 because I really liked the field-of-view of the 43mm Limited on the little camera. It fits in well with my kit, too (45, 90, 165, 300).
You could always look at the newer 75mm f/2.8 :)) On Aug 31, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > The 67 I've bought is coming without a lens and I'l looking for > recommendations about a choice of normal lens. I seem to recall that > the 105/2.4 is better regarded than the 90/2.8, but I think I'd still > prefer the shorter focal length, personally. An alternative I'd > consider would be a 75mm f/4.5, although it's a bit slow for a normal > lens. Any comments on any of this? Other suggestions? > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
