Now you are starting to see my complaint. I truly believe that a certain number of no votes will reject it and the judges will not see it. Basically, because the number of artists voting is much larger than the judges, you will always get a subset of them who will vote - luck of the draw on timing. So sometimes, a subset may overall reject a photo and sometimes accept it. That is why I was saying that the type of shooter may adversely effect the rejection. All of my wedding shots that were accepted were before the artist voting, since then, nothing has made it through. Go figure. I'm sure it has to be an amazing shot to get past all the artist voting - and maybe at this stage that is ok - there is quite a bit in the gallery now.
-- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, September 1, 2007, 7:48:42 AM, you wrote: DS> I don't know what the hell is going on. DS> One of the shots I mentioned the other day that had been declined (the DS> sunset shot), I resubmitted, and it has now been accepted. DS> ??? DS> Cheers, DS> Dave DS> On 9/1/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: >> "Kenneth Waller" >> > I seem to remember somewhere seeing that the judges will have the >> > final say on accepted images. >> > >> > Kenneth Waller >> Yeah, peer voters can vote it in and the judges can vote it out. >> >> But can the judges vote it in if the peer voters vote it out? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
