Makes me want to go hmmm. I shoot weddings with a K10D and an *istD using what are basically consumer zooms (the DA 50-200 and the DA 16-45), and I have no problem with focus. Light temperature is never a problem if you're shooting RAW, as you should be. Don't blame your equipment. Paul On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jerome wrote:
> [impatient? scroll down for the link] > > I shot my first wedding this past Saturday. Luckily, I was *not* > the paid > wedding photographer. Instead, some friends of mine who have a > videography > company let me tag along under the guise of their "still-shot > assistant". > In any event, I thought I'd share my experience in hopes of any > helpful > comments, criticisms, etc. Long story short, I learned that I am > not ready > for "prime time" just yet. But the practice was invaluable. > > To state the obvious: shooting a real wedding was a whole lot > different > than sitting around the house thinking about it! And getting > practice in a > situation where there was almost no pressure was great0, especially > given > the fact that I'm not all that thrilled with the results. If I was > getting > paid as the main photographer, I would definitely be stressing > right now > over the quality of the pictures. But one thing I will say is that I > LEARNED A LOT!! For example... > > 1. My autofocus is WAY too slow. FYI, I shot with 2 K10D's, a sigma > 70-200mm 2.8, 24-70mm 2.8, and the Pentax 12-24 lens. Granted > Pentax is > known for having slower autofocus than Canon and Nikon (begin debate > here)... but I've never seen this become a huge factor until > Saturday... > maybe because I mostly take pictures of waterfalls, landscapes, and > my son > who can't walk or crawl yet. Anyway, I missed a lot of shots while the > camera hunted for something to focus on. And many of the shots I > did fire > off were blurry beyond salvaging due to my shutter speed being too > slow. > In the end, I ended up having to switch to manual focus for almost > everything just for insurance purposes. > > 2. My #1 objective was to not be seen or be a distraction to the > other > photographer, and with that I thought I could get away with not using > flash for the entire ceremony. Big mistake. This particular church > is on > television almost every day, and so they have great tv lighting. I did > some test shots the night before and the light temp seemed perfect > w/o a > flash. Well, I don't know what happened from one day to the next, > but all > of my photos in the sanctuary came out with the worst reddish > yellow hue. > Example here: > > http://exposedfilm.net/wwsmith/yellow.jpg > > I haven't a clue how I didn't pick it up during the ceremony, but I > didn't. So of course it was a fight to neutralize everything in > Photoshop. > > 3. Probably the most important thing I messed up... I blew the > exposure > on all of the brides dress photos (d'oh!!). I think this is the one I > would've got murdered for if I was the "real photographer". > Absolutely no > detail in her dress. Just a big white mass. My guess is that I > should have > exposed for the dress and let everything else fall into place. If the > tuxedos ended up pitch black, I think that would've been better. But a > bride expects to see every trim line, lace, and bead on her dress > in the > photos. So I messed up big time on this one. According to all of my > photos, the bride just had on a big bright white sheet. > > But the tuxedos look sharp! (ha) > > 4. This is the only one that I couldn't do anything about. Being > 5th in > line behind 3 videographers and a paid photographer, I didn't want > to move > around too much, so my angles were limited. To be honest, even the > paid > photographer was in a number of spots that I don't think I would've > been > comfortable in (seemed a little intrusive). The funny part is, I've > got > about 5 shots that would've been great... but they've all got some > body > part of the other photographer in them (head, arm, shoulder, etc.) > It's > actually kinda funny. But hey, at least I know I stayed out of his > way. > > > 5. My flash recycle time was unbearable. I used the AF 540FGZ on both > bodies, and switched batteries on each one during the wedding. I > missed SO > MANY shots because the flash was recharging. The first thing I did on > Sunday was to order the Power Pack III from B&H. Hopefully that > will make > a huge difference the next time around (which is next Saturday, I > think). > Obviously I really need two, but alas there *is* a budget. > > And without further ado, here are the wee bit of keepers I managed to > salvage from the shoot. As always comments and suggestions are > welcomed > and encouraged. > > http://exposedfilm.net/wwsmith > > I'm looking forward to my next opportunity to see if I improve. > > Thanks for reading. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
