On 9/4/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You argue pro cat stew.
> So I don't take you seriously.

And speaks funny and has plastic money.

:-)

Dave
>
>
> Tim Typo
> Mostly Harmless
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 6:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Stupid lens survery
>
>
> On 9/4/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I'm not sure if I'd go the Pentax route again, judging from what I see
> > in the horison now. I love the K10D. I love my FA* 85, I'm also sure I'll
> > love the two fast DA* zooms. But where is the long lens lineup? The
> > 200/2,8
> > and 300/4 will not fill the gap for me. I need something longer. A 400/
> > would be a lot better. My K-500/4,5 has way too much CA to do what I
> > really
> > would like to do. In practical use it is an f:8. It is a lot better than
> > nothing, but far from what I'd like. And the really flexible and good
> > legacy
> > lenses are far too expensive at the moment.
>
> I know for a fact if all my kit was stolen or destroyed tomorrow, and
> I had to start all over again, Pentax wouldn't be my first, or second,
> choice.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 03.09.2007
> 09:31
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to