rg2,
Mark Roberts just called the lens site out for you.
I bookmarked it, thanks to him.
I think you saw it.
http://medfmt.8k.com/third/index.html
Regards, Bob S.

On 9/6/07, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >4)  Another strategy would be to beg the list here for a lens in the
> >focal length you want to try.  Somebody will loan you one or sell you
> >a spare for peanuts.
>
> That WOULD be a good idea, except that I just openly admitted on
> another thread that I'm good at breaking stuff.  oops.
>
> >2)  Pick a focal length you are interested in and buy something for
> >$5-$10-$15, no more.  There are way too many of these old lenses out
> >there.
>
> I don't have a penny to spend right now, so I'm just browsing around
> and learning while my spare change accumulates.  Saving up for stuff
> is good; it forces me to wait - and while I wait I learn  :o)
> Everyone here seems so full of information and willing to share it,
> and I haven't been yelled at for my excess of novice questions (yet).
>
> >1)  f2 to f2.8 lenses are probably better quality (zooms @ f3.5 or less),
> >if the mnufacturer bothered to go fast, they were trying for more quality.
> >Most of the scrap is f3.5, f4, or f4.5+.
>
>
> Your advice is excellent - that's a great point about faster lenses
> probably being a higher quality.  Makes sense.  Although, speed is
> less important than sharpness to me.  Should we start a flame war over
> that?  Faster or sharper?  If you can shoot faster, then your pictures
> should be sharper, but then, a sharp lens is, well, a sharp lens...
>
> Any clue as to where the "cult classics" page might have gone?  Maybe
> I'll just email the guy.
>
> rg2
>
>
> On 9/6/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rg2,
> > Sears can go all the way back to screwmount Pentax compatible.
> > There are a ton of these lenses out there.
> > Many manufacturers sold stuf to Sears, JC Penneys, Mail-order that fit 
> > Pentax.
> > Robert Mongahan used to have a web page called cult classics listing the 
> > best.
> > >From a practical point of view...
> > 1)  f2 to f2.8 lenses are probably better quality (zooms @ f3.5 or less),
> > if the mnufacturer bothered to go fast, they were trying for more quality.
> > Most of the scrap is f3.5, f4, or f4.5+.
> > 2)  Pick a focal length you are interested in and buy something for
> > $5-$10-$15, no more.  There are way too many of these old lenses out
> > there.
> > 3)  Get some advice here, Somebody had trouble with Rikoh lenses being
> > not quite compatible - ie they went on the camera but wouldn't come
> > off!
> > 4)  Another strategy would be to beg the list here for a lens in the
> > focal length you want to try.  Somebody will loan you one or sell you
> > a spare for peanuts.
> > Regards,  Bob S.
> >
> > On 9/6/07, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Honestly, I'm looking at a site that's alternative to Ebay and there's
> > > lenses here with names I'm unsure of...Yashica, Hanimar, Chinon,
> > > Rokinon, Soligor, Tokina, Sears - what camera did Sears make lenses
> > > for?
> > >
> > > rg2
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/6/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Rebekah,
> > > > There are many, especially from the '70's & '80's.
> > > > What did you have in mind?
> > > > I'm sure folks here can steer you to the good ones.
> > > > I remember Vivitar and Kiron as better quality.
> > > > Regards, Bob S.
> > > >
> > > > On 9/6/07, Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Is there anywhere I can find a list of companies that produce or did
> > > > > produce lenses to fit Pentax cameras?
> > > > >
> > > > > rg2
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to