I agree: ouch.

Glen

On Sep 7, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Rebekah wrote:

> I saw a lens on Ebay for a 67 camera listed at almost $1000.  Is that
> for real?  ouch.
> rg2
>
>
> On 9/7/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gonz,
>> So you got that one!  Good searching techniques.
>> Regards, Bob S.
>>
>> On 9/7/07, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Congrats Mark, but I beat you to the 0.5 brotherhood.  My  
>>> lensless 67
>>> body arrived on Wed. I'm hunting for a lens now too.  Mine is a
>>> non-metered prism beast, but I paid only $165 for it.
>>>
>>> On 9/7/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> My eBay'ed Pentax 67 arrived yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> Even though I've handled one before, I had to laugh when I  
>>>> picked it
>>>> up. That thing is huge! (And I won't have a lens for it until next
>>>> week!) I felt like I was in a cartoon or something ;-) except  
>>>> that I
>>>> would think cartoon cameras are much lighter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to