Seems you really did a lot of work on the revised version, since I see no detail at all in the unrevised version...
Tim Øsleby wrote: > First thanks for all commenteds. > Raving positive comments, less positive and negative are all appreciated. > Positive makes me fell good, and negative kickes me further. > > Bruce and Charles expressed curiosoty about the unreversed splashes. How it > looked before reversing them. > Here is the colour version, and a a b&w version, both with unreversed > splashes. Just click at the thumbs below the image. > I've reversed second and third splash, but IMO it's the third that makes the > differense. > > As I said. I'm not convinced this is the perfect rendering. I had troubles > smoothening the water, without making the bird disappear in the shadows. All > tonal, cropping and sharpening work are done within Lightroom. Only the > reversing part in Elements. > > So ideas are very appreciated. > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
