Well, you should calibrate your monitor first of all. Then set Adobe's Color Settings up to manage color properly. You're complaining about rendering qualities between different applications, not to the printer, and the only way there is a hope of getting color to work consistently in this manner is to set up color management as best possible and use an sRGB standard profile on output.
The correct sRGB profile to have as a default working color space, if that's what you want, is "sRGB IEC61966-2.1" in Adobe Photoshop. Not Nikon or anyone else's sRGB profile. Personally, I use ProPhoto RGB for editing and output for the website with conversion to the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 profile. My results seem to look very consistent when I compare between several different browsers and image display programs, both those that honor embedded profiles and those that do not. Godfrey On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Pål Jensen wrote: > Godfrey wrote: > > > - Are you editing on a calibrated monitor? > - What is your default working colorspace? > - Are you converting from your working colorspace to sRGB? > > > REPLY: > > No. The monitor is not calibrated. However, I have no real mismatch > between > monitor and prints. > The default working space is sRGB. However, I've noticed that the > files I > saved for the web last year have colorspace data (under file Info: > advanced) > saying "ICCProfile: Nikon sRBG 4.0.0.3001" and under EXIF data > saying "color > space: 65535". These files works fine. No such data exist on my new > scans > although I am quite sure I used the same procedure. The new files > simply > says "colormode: 3". -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
