> But my first thoughts are "BIG!" and "HEAVY!" Big & heavy, you haven't seen big & heavy until you've lugged a 600mm FA for a mile or so in the bush!
Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm > >> >> From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 12:30:41 GMT >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm >> >> Hal Davis wrote: >> > What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8? >> >> It's a great lens, but /expensive/. I paid less for all of my cameras >> and lenses put together ... well, that's a /little/ bit of an >> exaggeration, but not a terrible one. ;-) >> > > The Tamron equivalent seems to be a good lens and can be comparatively > cheap. > > But my first thoughts are "BIG!" and "HEAVY!" > > > ----------------------------------------- > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
