On 9/11/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But my first thoughts are "BIG!" and "HEAVY!"
>
> Big & heavy, you haven't seen big & heavy until you've lugged a 600mm FA for
> a mile or so in the bush!

One day.:-)

Dave
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 12:30:41 GMT
> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
> >>
> >> Hal Davis wrote:
> >> > What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
> >>
> >> It's a great lens, but /expensive/.  I paid less for all of my cameras
> >> and lenses put together ... well, that's a /little/ bit of an
> >> exaggeration, but not a terrible one. ;-)
> >>
> >
> > The Tamron equivalent seems to be a good lens and can be comparatively
> > cheap.
> >
> > But my first thoughts are "BIG!" and "HEAVY!"
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to