It is, of course, in the eye of the beholder. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What is "sheer beauty"? > > G > > On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's the > > compositon that makes a shot memorable. But a fascinating subject > > can achieve that as well. And of course sheer beauty is always > > worth a second look. In truth, there is no single, narrow definition. > > Paul > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> The question you posed is indeed "What is a good picture?" a > >>>> sibling > >>>> to "What is art?" ... > >>> > >>> We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time... > >>> > >>> ;-) > >> > >> > >> :o) that, and "does a good subject make a good picture?" > >> > >> > >> rg2 > >> > >> On 9/13/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On 9/13/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> The question you posed is indeed "What is a good picture?" a > >>>> sibling > >>>> to "What is art?" ... > >>> > >>> We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time... > >>> > >>> ;-) > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> frank > >>> > >>> -- > >>> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its > >> composition" > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
