> 
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon PM 01:18:41 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
> 
> Excellent. I mean - this is more or less what I want - to have
> understandable and clear control on the amount of light that falls on
> the subject. And swivel is very important.
> 
> How much costs an excellent condition AF280T these days?
> 
> Thanks.

Still available new, I think.  About $200US.

> 
> On 9/24/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It doesn't know which aperture you choose. You do. It assumes. If you
> > set the ISO on the back of the flash to the ISO you are going to use,
> > (it tops out at 800). The red and green scales, (the red and green bars
> > under the fstop scale), look something like this (forgive the crappy
> > text graphics).
> >
> > ______w__I__t Green (High Power)
> > __________w__I__t Red (Low Power)
> >
> > On the sliding scale Pick the nearest f stop to the tall center uptick
> > either red or green depending on where you set the auto/power setting.
> > The flash assumes that setting. The meter and feet values tell you the
> > minimum, (where the horizontal bar begins), and maximum, (where the
> > uptic, index mark), distance that the flash sensor will give a good
> > exposure. You can extrapolate the f stop values higher ISOs but you kind
> > of run out of f stops at distances where the sensor is guaranteed to work.
> >
> > Boris Liberman wrote:
> > > Cory, when you say "work well" you mean that flash measures the light
> > > on its own and it gives correct exposure as a result, right? If so,
> > > how does flash knows which aperture I chose?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Boris,
> > >> I have both the AF 200T and the 280.  They both seem to work well in 
> > >> their
> > >> "auto" setting with my K10.  Of course, TTL is out, but I think I used 
> > >> them
> > >> mostly in auto on the *istD anyway.
> > >>
> > >> Cory
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:58 AM
> > >> Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Hi!
> > >>>
> > >>> I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
> > >>> full discharge on K10D. I don't want to buy either 540th or 360th
> > >>> flashes. They are too expensive and 360th does not swivel.
> > >>>
> > >>> It seems that AF280T has both manual control on the power of discharge
> > >>> and its own light sensor. Do you think it would be a reasonable flash
> > >>> for K10D (in fully manual mode) that both tilts and swivels and can
> > >>> measure light on its own for better exposure?
> > >>>
> > >>> Anyone on the list using AF280T with their K10D? Anyone willing to 
> > >>> enable
> > >>> me?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Boris
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >>> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1023 - Release Date:
> > >>> 9/22/2007 1:27 PM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> --
> > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Remember, it's pillage then burn.
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Boris
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to