LOL ... Of course my inference was a bit of hyperbole. But you shift the bases of your discrimination so fluidly, Tom... ;-)
The discussion was not about money. It was about which was the better camera of the two listed. You brought into this a completely different notion on a skew line. G On Sep 26, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Tom C wrote: > The inference you make is illogical. I never said cost was the > *only* thing > that was important. It would be logical to conclude the opposite, > in fact. > > If cost *was the only thing* that was important, then sure, go for the > lowest price DSLR. That's not what I said though. Since I stated a > K10D (a > superior camera albeit at a *higher* price) would likely be > available at a > more affordable price soon, the logical inference would be that I was > suggesting getting a better camera at a lower price. > > You want to pick on the word 'cost' and imply that since nothing > else was > mentioned, that it was not considered. That's like saying if I > state I'm > going to the grocery store, that by inference, I'm not going to the > gas > station also. How can one infer from the absence of information? > >> Of course they're my words. I wrote them. >> >> They represent a logical inference from your statements. The question >> is whether the inference is correct, and if it isn't, then what >> exactly are you intending to mean? >> >>> Your words, not mine. >>> >>>> So ... By your comment, the only thing that's important is how much >>>> something costs. >>>> It's one way of looking at the world, I guess. >>>> >>>>> There's really no right or wrong. If one waits 6 months a K10D >>>>> will >>>>> probably cost under $600. >>>>> >>>>>> At last. Solid, direct, simple advice. >>>>>> Possibly wrong, but who's counting for accuracy? ];-) >>>>>> >>>>>>> Go with the Nikon. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
