On 9/28/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Among the less expensive, "non-pro" print films, which do you prefer, > Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am > wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400 > speeds offered by both brands.
Regular old Kodak Gold 100 and 200 are pretty darned nice films. I've done 8x10 blowups from gold 200 with no visible grain. I also like Fuji Superia Reala, though that probably counts as a "pro" film. -Mat -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
