> 
> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/10/01 Mon PM 10:14:03 GMT
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: DA70 and 24x36 coverage
> 
> Kinda kills ya doesn't it? :-)
> 
> Tom C.

A little bit of me dies every time it happens.

> 
> >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: DA70 and 24x36 coverage
> >Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:02:43 -0400
> >
> >If the comments below are true, it's bad. The lens designation
> >should convey if a lens wont cover 24x36mm IMHO. A APS-C only
> >lens is not the same thing as a 24x36 lens and there should be
> >an easy way to know by the lens designation IMHO.
> >jco
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> >Godfrey DiGiorgi
> >Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:37 PM
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >Subject: Re: DA70 and 24x36 coverage
> >
> >
> >On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> > > I am asking my question mainly because if it indeed covered full frame
> >
> > > and there were no image deterioration past the APC frame, Pentax
> > > probably would have given it FDA designation instead of DA.
> >
> >The D-FA mount includes an aperture ring control. DA lenses do not.
> >
> >The DA70 has no aperture ring control, it was design for use with the
> >digital SLR bodies. Whether it actually covers 24x36 mm format isn't
> >really relevant to the mount designation.
> >
> >Godfrey
> >
> >---
> >Not really relevant but interesting:
> >
> >In the course of researching my latest lens acquisition, I saw an
> >article about someone who took an M42 mount Pentax Fish-Eye-Takumar
> >17mm lens and cobbled up a mount to fit it on a 6x6 rollfilm folder
> >with behind-lens leaf shutter. His goal was to make circular fish eye
> >images inexpensively ... it produced an image circle ~ 45mm in
> >diameter on the 6x6 format film, which suited his needs perfectly.
> >---
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >follow the directions.
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to