This is tempting. When I was a kid (teenager) I shot nothing but Tri-x which I would develop in my basement darkroom (Nerd, I know). I don't have good scanner but I could just tell you if it works. Or I could just make up results and save the money . . .
>>> "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/2/2007 1:16 PM >>> My previous post explains the, at least in my twisted mind. (The use of the DA 40 was incidental)... Steve Desjardins wrote: > see what? > > I did think about sticking this lens on my MZ-S and shooting a roll to > answer the coverage question. I would like an excuse to use the MZ-S. > Maybe a roll of Tri-X . . . > > Steven Desjardins > Department of Chemistry > Washington and Lee University > Lexington, VA 24450 > (540) 458-8873 > FAX: (540) 458-8878 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/2/2007 12:33 PM >>> >>>> > See! > > Steve Desjardins wrote: > >> Oops. This was taken with the DA 40. >> >> >> > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:47028078112741437822267! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
