Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > Well, for me 'better' image quality would be a mix of more: sharpness, color > rendition, contrast... and less: distortions, chromatic aberrations, flare, > fringing... > > It's said that a prime in general produces 'better' images than a zoom, and > also in general, 2 short range zooms produce better results than a long range > zoom. However, there are many exceptions to this 'rule' and maybe a good long > range zoom can produce better results than 2 shorter 'kit' zooms. > This was my question. > >>From this answer I understand that the most probable is that the results of >>the 2 zooms are better in some aspects (resolution?) and worst or just >>different in other (color rendition?).
Certainly possible. Only testing will tell. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
