Hanimax was at one time the Practica distributor, Pentax was a Practica
clone. I think Hanimax was based in that land down under, Oz.

--graywolf
-------------------------------------------------
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.


----- Original Message -----
From: Kent Gittings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: Why Hanimex is now identical to Pentax.


> The 50/4 would have to be the macro lens. A much more valuable lens than
one
> of the standard 50mm lenses although admittedly slower. Hanimax is just
one
> of the clone makers, althopugh I think it is a German company.
> Kent Gittings
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jody
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why Hanimex is now identical to Pentax.
>
>
> Another email that got lost when the gremlins
> unsubscribed me, was about my new (old) lens.
>
> I went to one of the two local camera shops looking
> for lenses. I know that the other does wonderful
> processing, but has no second-hand gear.  Well, turned
> out this one had no second-hand gear either, but the
> guy suggested Cash Converters (Criminal Central).  I
> was rather dubious as I had been to CC in other towns,
> and nothing remotely Pentax.  But I thought it
> couldn't hurt to try.
>
> So I went there and asked the sales assistant if there
> were any Pentax lenses in the cabinet, they had them
> positioned in such a way that it was impossible to
> tell.  So she started pulling all these lenses out of
> the cabinet.  "Here, this one's Pentax", she said.
> OK, since when does Hanimex=Pentax?  The thread wasn't
> even the right diameter.  After pulling out a few more
> which she insisted were Pentax, but surprisingly
> weren't, I was astonished to discover that the next
> few she handed me were actually Pentaxes.
>
> There were three of them, all M lenses, M55:f2 or f4 I
> think, M50:f4 and the one I finally chose M50:f1.7.
> It is in pretty darn good condition too, complete with
> Zenith Tempest 1A skylight.  It cost me NZ$69
> (~US$50).   I am quite happy with it.  I keep
> nostalgically fantasising about the M50:f1.4 on my
> Spotmatic, but then again, how much difference really
> between f1.4 and f1.7?  I love these M lenses though.
> They just seem to have that nice feel to them, lovely
> to hold, lovely to focus.
>
> Jody.
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to