Do we know that? That is what the reporter said, but I would think the attorneys involved would know better. Just as some here seem to confuse copyright and property rights, so do reporters, sigh! That is the problem with trying an issue via news reports, and why hearsay is not given much weight as evidence.
So it appears that we are pretty much in agreement, only I did not consider the report as accurate as you seem to have. P. J. Alling wrote: > You're right it isn't a copyright or trademark issue, it is a property > rights/trespass issue, however the lawyers for the Plantation decided to > sue the photographer for copyright infringement, for which they clearly > have no standing. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
