Tom C wrote: > A critique: > > Scott, I haven't used a 645 macro, but this doesn't look like a macro > shot, more like a telephoto image. Not sure of the size of the flower > or your distance from it, but in general I would expect to see much > higher magnification if a macro was used in the macro sense. The little > bit of leaves on the left is somewhat bothersome. > > Tom C.
Thanks, Tom. It's definitely not a 1:1 shot. The flower itself was probably 5 or 6 inches in diameter and the front element was several inches away, so I guess it's not technically a "macro" shot. But I used a macro lens! > >> >> On Oct 9, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> This is one of my first macro attempts. P645, 120 Macro, Provia >> >>> >> >> 100. >> >> >> >>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/ >> >>> photo#5119497365061190178 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for looking. Comments, critiques and general cries of >> >>> >> >> anguish >> >> >> >>> are all appreciated. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Find out how you can get spam free email. >> > http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3 >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Remember, it’s pillage then burn. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1059 - Release Date: 10/9/2007 > 8:44 AM -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
