I apologize for the typos.  This post should read:

Where are you getting this?  I never said that B&H, or anyone else,  
should be "denied the means of subsistence."  Again, all I said is  
that I choose not to support them.  Like some who choose to take a  
stand for the environment, or for politician so and so, or for  
proposition x-y-z, I choose to take a stand for Christ.

I am well aware of Red China's doings, and, no, you will find very,  
very little in my house that has the "Made in China" designation.   
Again, I do what I could.  What do you do?  What type of research  
have you undertaken?

Glen

On Oct 10, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Tom C wrote:

> I'm not going to carry on a public debate with you either, other to  
> point out that your stance clearly contradicts the spirit of being  
> Christian.
>
> Romans 5:8 - 'but God shows his love for us in that while we were  
> still sinners, Christ died for us.'
>
> Mark 12:31 - 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'
>
> Clearly the belief that someone should be denied the means of  
> subsistence based on their beliefs is unchristian.
>
> I'd point out that 'Our Beloved Wal-Mart' as well as just about  
> every retail establishment in this country is supporting a godless  
> Red China - yet you no doubt support their economy through your  
> purchases.
>
> Tom C.
>
>> From: Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing (Long winded)
>> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:40:48 -0400
>>
>> I do not wish to engage in a protracted debate, as this subject has
>> arisen only because someone had mentioned why he has chosen to
>> patronize B&H.  Likewise, I should not have to defend my decision not
>> to patronize them.
>>
>> However, in short, I note that Sacred Scripture does not corroborate
>> your view.  You highlight a verse in St. Matthew's Gospel in
>> isolation.  The matter of being aware of those who oppose Christ and
>> His Church has nothing to do with "making friends."  Christ came to
>> reconcile the world to Himself, and to provide the Good News for
>> those who were of goodwill, for those who were (and are) willing to
>> listen.  Christ did not come to ingratiate Himself to the world, i.e.
>> to its powers, publicans, and pretenders.  Rather, His Cross is
>> precisely the opposite of that: it stands in overt contradiction to
>> the world and its ways.  His entire public ministry, which spanned
>> three years of His life (beginning at the Wedding Feast of Cana),
>> contradicts the view that Christ was some sort of UN negotiator.
>>
>> Further, His words and actions continually characterize His Divine
>> Mission.  Since you have brought up St. Matthew's Gospel, let us
>> search there for Our Lord's edifying words: "Do not think that I am
>> come to send peace upon earth: rather I came not to send peace, but
>> the sword" (Mt 10:34), "He who is not with me, is against me: and he
>> that gathereth not with me, scattereth (Mt 12:30)," and "Every plant
>> which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up" (Mt
>> 15:13).  These are not the words of a modern politician.  Even the
>> Scribes and Pharisees knew that they were the words of no common man.
>>
>> Those who contradict and blaspheme Jesus Christ clearly scattereth,
>> and, as Our Lord directs, I will avoid having any complicity in their
>> doctrines or deeds.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote:
>>
>> > I guess the little problem I see with this reasoning is that not
>> > even God himself takes that viewpoint, according to the Bible.
>> >
>> > “
>> > He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain
>> > on the righteous and the unrighteous” (Matt. 5:45).
>> >
>> > To alienate someone for their beliefs is not a way of making  
>> friends.
>> >
>> > Tom C.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> From: Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing (Long winded)
>> >> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:34:23 -0400
>> >>
>> >> I thank you for you comments, Scott.  Since you have made note  
>> of the
>> >> subject, I will explain my position with regard to B&H.
>> >>
>> >> I am familiar with B&H's reputation for customer service.  My
>> >> avoidance of B&H et. al. has nothing to do with prejudice stemming
>> >> from a stereotypical opinion of large, New York-based  
>> businesses.  My
>> >> avoidance of businesses such as B&H is founded strictly upon my
>> >> religious views.  I, as much as possible, will not support  
>> those whom
>> >> I know to honor or reverence that which condemns or blasphemes Our
>> >> Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, His Blessed Mother, or His Saints.   
>> The
>> >> Talmud, in numerous locations, refers to Our Lord, and His Blessed
>> >> Mother, in such a manner.  Thus, I make an effort to avoid  
>> supporting
>> >> those who honor the Talmud.
>> >>
>> >> I apply a like boycott to business that support ideologies or
>> >> activities that I find morally objectionable.  For example, I, as
>> >> much as possible, avoid companies or other establishments that  
>> fund
>> >> Planned Parenthood or promote other attacks on life (including
>> >> euthanasia, contraception, and unjust wars--which is why I am  
>> opposed
>> >> to America's occupation of Iraq).  I have employed the words, "as
>> >> much as possible" here so as to highlight the realities of any
>> >> boycott.  That is, while I have done rather extensive research in
>> >> these areas, I know that I do not possess an unlimited access to
>> >> information.  Secondly, as Jean-Francois Orsini of the St.  
>> Antoninus
>> >> Institute points out, a complete boycott is rather impossible.   
>> One
>> >> must realize that sources of blasphemy, irreligion, and immorality
>> >> have lengthy tentacles.  For instance, Johnson & Johnson (a pro- 
>> abort
>> >> firm) produces a dazzling array of name brand and generic  
>> products,
>> >> some of which are necessary for everyday living, and some of which
>> >> one may not even be able to determine are produced by Johnson &
>> >> Johnson.  Hence, I do that which is physically and logistically
>> >> possible--what Orsini and others call a "virtual boycott"--and I
>> >> leave the rest to Our Blessed Mother.
>> >>
>> >> Glen
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Glen Tortorella wrote:
>> >> >> Thank you, Adam...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Will the Moab 5x7 paper you mention work with the R280?  I just
>> >> want
>> >> >> to make sure of this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Though, I am somewhat disappointed, as Newegg is now out of
>> >> stock on
>> >> >> the R280.  I would prefer buying it from them.  I know the  
>> R280 is
>> >> >> probably available (at a good price, too) at one of the popular
>> >> New
>> >> >> York camera stores (B&H, Adorama, etc.), but I would rather not
>> >> >> purchase it from these stores.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > FWIW, B&H is wonderful to do business with.  I've spent more  
>> than I
>> >> > should have with them over the last few years and have received
>> >> > nothing
>> >> > but good service.  Every order has been correct, shipping has  
>> been
>> >> > within a day or two of placing the order, and the one time I  
>> had a
>> >> > question for them they replied very promptly with the  
>> information I
>> >> > requested.  You really can't go wrong with B&H.  I've had the  
>> same
>> >> > sort
>> >> > of service from Newegg, but I prefer to order anything photo
>> >> related
>> >> > from the guys in New Yawk.  B&H has the R280 in stock at the  
>> same
>> >> > price
>> >> > as Newegg.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Scott Loveless
>> >> > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly  
>> above
>> >> > and follow the directions.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>> >> and follow the directions.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>> > and follow the directions.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
>> and follow the directions.
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to